Oh, how the mighty have
fallen. This time last year, Lance
Armstrong was an All-American Golden Boy.
He was the squeakiest of the squeaky clean, a guy who parents would hold
up as an example for their kids. Not
only was Armstrong an Olympian and Tour de France Champion, and the
international face of the professional cycling, but he did it all after beating
cancer. He went so far as chastising
those who insisted that no one could seriously compete in professional cycling
without using performance enhancing drugs, and suing a British newspaper that
raised allegations that he had doped. It
turns out that Lance Armstrong is the Cheating Champion of the World. And he’s not just a cheater, but also a bald-faced
liar.
So now we all know the truth –
Armstrong is not superhuman. Like Bonds,
Sosa, McGwire, and the rest of baseball’s cheater’s club, he’s just a juiced-up
dope fiend. In hind sight, it’s not so
shocking. We all probably should have
known better than to think that an ordinary man could accomplish unbelievable
feats through purely natural means, no matter how talented and hard-working he
may be. That takes the magic out of
sports, but those guys never asked us to peek behind the curtain. When you demand the truth about your heroes
you’re asking to be disappointed.
Lots of people are understandably
upset to see an American hero revealed as being, basically, just like the rest
of us. Maybe not everyone would cheat to
win or lie to get rich, but some people would.
In fact, lots of people would, and until you’re actually confronted with
the opportunity to do so at the professional level it’s hard to know how you
might react. That doesn’t make what
Armstrong did commendable or even forgivable, but it puts his actions in a
realistic perspective.
And let’s not forget the good
that Armstrong has done in the real world – the world where being able to ride
a bicycle super fast has little practical value (I guarantee my 2005 Nissan
Altima could beat Armstrong in a race, and my car isn’t even on steroids).
Through his charity work, Lance
Armstrong has raised nearly $50 million for cancer research. He’s also raised awareness about the disease,
and brought hope and inspiration to countless people. If it weren’t for Lance Armstrong, the sport
of professional cycling would be virtually ignored in the United States (you
know, more so). And through endorsement deals, he’s been a boon to the economy. (There’s some talk that Armstrong should have
to return some of his endorsement money, which completely ignores the risk that
a sponsor takes when it pays for a celebrity endorsement).
So Lance Armstrong cheated and
lied. That’s the wrong thing to do, and
there’s no doubt in my mind that he did it for purely selfish reasons. But a lot of good, honest people benefited
from Armstrong’s lies. That doesn’t
excuse his actions, but it raises interesting questions about how the rest of
us are entitled to react. Can we condemn
Lance Armstrong? Sure. Can we demand that our athletes compete on an
even playing field? Absolutely. But in doing so, we’ll have to accept that
the is no Superman.
No comments:
Post a Comment